French parliament lays groundwork for veil ban

France’s parliament will vote on a resolution aimed at reaffirming the nation’s values – and specifying that Muslim veils that cover the face are contrary to gender equality. The resolution lays the groundwork for a law forbidding face-covering veils everywhere in public.

The nonbinding resolution amounts to a policy statement and is widely expected to win approval in a vote Tuesday night in the National Assembly. The next step will be discussion of a draft law on banning burqa-like veils in public. The government is still drafting that bill, which is more divisive than Tuesday’s resolution. President Nicolas Sarkozy is pushing for a full ban.

Associated Press, 11 May 2010

French parliament adopts resolution condemning veil nem con

Veil ban protestFrench lawmakers unanimously passed a resolution on Tuesday asserting that face-covering Muslim veils are contrary to the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity on which France is founded.

The non-binding resolution, passed 434 to 0, lays the groundwork for a planned law forbidding face-covering veils in public, including in the streets.

One lawmaker compared women who fully cover themselves to “phantoms” and “walking coffins.”

The bill calling for a global ban on such garments goes before parliament in July. A draft text is to be reviewed by the Cabinet on May 19. A similar veil ban is in the works in neighboring Belgium.

Tuesday’s resolution, sponsored by President Nicolas Sarkozy’s conservative party, had been widely expected to win approval in the National Assembly with rival Socialists backing it despite concerns about the wording of an eventual law. Lawmakers in the 577-seat house who opposed the resolution abstained.

“The freedom of women is what brings us here … Have we the choice (to say no) when the symptoms of the regression of women are in the streets?” asked Nicole Ameline, a lawmaker from Sarkozy’s UMP party and former minister for women’s rights.

Associated Press, 11 May 2010

Christopher Hitchens backs French ‘burqa’ ban, compares veiled women to Ku Klux Klan

Hitchens“The French legislators who seek to repudiate the wearing of the veil or the burqa – whether the garment covers ‘only’ the face or the entire female body – are often described as seeking to impose a ‘ban’.

“To the contrary, they are attempting to lift a ban: a ban on the right of women to choose their own dress, a ban on the right of women to disagree with male and clerical authority, and a ban on the right of all citizens to look one another in the face. The proposed law is in the best traditions of the French republic, which declares all citizens equal before the law and – no less important – equal in the face of one another….

“Ah, but the particular and special demand to consider the veil and the burqa as an exemption applies only to women. And it also applies only to religious practice (and, unless we foolishly pretend otherwise, only to one religious practice). This at once tells you all you need to know: Society is being asked to abandon an immemorial tradition of equality and openness in order to gratify one faith, one faith that has a very questionable record in respect of females.

“Let me ask a simple question to the pseudoliberals who take a soft line on the veil and the burqa. What about the Ku Klux Klan? Notorious for its hooded style and its reactionary history, this gang is and always was dedicated to upholding Protestant and Anglo-Saxon purity….

“Why should Europeans and Americans, seeking perhaps to accommodate Muslim immigrants, adopt the standard only of the most backward and primitive Muslim states? The burqa and the veil, surely, are the most aggressive sign of a refusal to integrate or accommodate….

“My right to see your face is the beginning of it, as is your right to see mine. Next but not least comes the right of women to show their faces, which easily trumps the right of their male relatives or their male imams to decide otherwise. The law must be decisively on the side of transparency. The French are striking a blow not just for liberty and equality and fraternity, but for sorority too.”

Christopher Hitchens at Slate, 10 May 2010

Italian Muslim leader condemns suppression of the veil

Veiled Muslim women have become the true upholders of western traditions of female dress, says Italy’s top imam, who angrily condemned the decision to fine a woman in Italy for wearing a veil that completely covered her features.

Izzedin Elzir, the president of the Union of Islamic Communities in Italy (UCOII) and a former fashion designer, said: “If we go and see the beautiful artistic representations of the Madonna, we see her with the veil. We don’t see her semi-naked, I think. For that reason, I believe it is the Muslims who are protecting the traditions of our country.” The imam said: “I believe Italian tradition is that which can be seen by going to a church, to a museum and seeing the beautiful images of the Madonna with a beautiful veil. That is our tradition.”

A €500 (£430) fine was imposed on Amel Marmouri, a Tunisian woman, who was stopped last week by carabinieri. Marmouri, 26, was covered head-to-toe, though it was unclear whether she was wearing an Afghan-style burqa or the niqab, which is more common on the Arabian peninsula.

Marmouri’s husband, 36-year-old Braim Ben Salah, said they were merely obeying the Qur’an, which said she “may not be looked at by other men”. But Elzir disputed that. “There are two interpretations,” he said. “One interpretation has it that the woman should be totally covered. Another says the woman should be covered totally, except for her face and hands. Both schools of thought are valid and it depends on the woman which school she chooses. The important thing is the freedom of the individual. Whether the face is covered or not covered, this belongs to the private sphere of the individual where we believe our constitution – the Italian constitution – guarantees religious freedom.”

He said the UCOII was not in favour of full veils. But, in a pointed allusion to Italy’s in-your-face variety shows with their scantily clad hostesses, he added: “It’s a personal choice, like a woman who decides to go on television half-naked. That’s her freedom. That’s her choice.”

Elzir said that, when faced with episodes such as the fining of Marmouri, “the [Muslim] community feels really discriminated against. There are serious problems in our country, not whether one wears the full veil or does not use the full veil, but problems of the economy, which is crumbling, [and] of unemployment. I believe the politicians and those who have the responsibility for governing ought to be looking at the reality and trying to resolve the problems of society, rather than creating them.”

Ben Salah said that the fine imposed on his wife meant she could no longer leave their house. “So what is better?” asked the imam. “That we condemn these hundred or so women who cover up their faces to spend the rest of their lives at home?”

Observer, 9 May 2010

Italy: another council decides to fine veiled women

The northern city of Cossato on Friday became the third local authority in Italy to impose fines on women who cover their faces in public. The head-to-toe Islamic burqa and the niqab, which leaves the eyes visible are not specifically named in the by-law but are understood to be its target.

The fines will range from 25 to 100 euros. Elsewhere in northern Italy, Varallo and Novara city councils have already imposed fines on burqa and niqab wearers.

“There’s no security emergency in Cossato. But I want to stress that people coming to our country have obligations as well as rights,” said mayor Claudio Corradino, who belongings to Italy’s anti-immigrant Northern League party.

AKI, 7 May 2010

UKIP leader says veil is symbol of violence and hatred

The leader of UKIP has said the Islamic veil should be banned as it represents fear and is a security risk.

Speaking in a phone-in on BBC 5 live, Lord Pearson said there was a “problem” within Islam because some people used the Koran to justify terrorist acts.

Speaking to Nicky Campbell, Lord Pearson said: “I constantly say to my mild Muslim friends, listen, you must realise these days, when we use the word ‘terrorism’ we are almost always referring to a problem which comes from violent Islam.

“You must realise that we do not hate you, but we fear your violent co-religionists and we have good reason to do that. And we see the burka in public and the niqab as a symbol of that and we fear it. The hatred is coming towards us.”

BBC News, 4 May 2010

Via ENGAGE

Australian senator calls for veil ban

Cory BernardiThe shadow parliamentary secretary assisting Tony Abbott, Cory Bernardi, has called for Islamic women to be banned from wearing the burqa in a pointer to the growing assertiveness of the party’s conservative wing.

Writing on his blog yesterday, he argued his case on law and order grounds and the basis of respect for women. ”The burqa is no longer simply the symbol of female repression and Islamic culture, it is now emerging as a disguise of bandits and n’er do wells,” he wrote. He was responding to a police report describing a hold-up in Sydney by a suspect in a burqa and sunglasses and said the garb could be used as a disguise.

”Perhaps some of you will consider that burqa wearing should be a matter of personal choice, consistent with the freedoms our forefathers fought for. I disagree,” the senator wrote. ”New arrivals to this country should not come here to re-create the living environment they have just left. They should come here for a better life based on the freedoms and values that have built our great nation.”

Sydney Morning Herald, 6 May 2010

See also “Burqa ban is ‘un-Australian’ say Muslims”, Herald Sun, 7 May 2010

Italy: Tunisian woman fined for wearing veil

A 26-year-old Tunisian woman has been fined for wearing a face veil while walking to a mosque in northern Italy, stoking an increasing debate on the integration of Muslim minorities in Europe.

Police in the city of Novara, a stronghold of Italy’s anti-immigration Northern League, stopped the Muslim woman on Friday while she was walking with her husband to prayers wearing a black niqab that covered her face but left her eyes exposed.

Police handed her a 500-euro fine under a bylaw introduced in January by the mayor of Novara which bans clothing in public that prevents identification by police.

“We just enforced a local law that stops people from covering their face near sensitive places like schools, hospitals or post offices,” inspector Leonardo Borghesani told Reuters. “We understand the fine is hefty, but she can appeal.”

The Northern League, a coalition ally of conservative Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, is pushing for legislation to outlaw face-covering Islamic garments in public.

Reuters, 4 May 2010

See also CNN, 4 May 2010

Germany’s interior minister rejects veil ban

Thomas_de_Maiziere_CDUGermany’s interior minister has criticized the ban on wearing a full Islamic veil, or burqa, in public, saying Tuesday even a debate would be “unnecessary in Germany.”

Thomas de Maiziere, from the majority coalition partner, the Christian Democratic Party, or CDU, said his country does “not need a ban,” as there are at most a hundred women who wear burqas, in a video interview with the German Leibziger Volkszeitung.

Earlier this week, another CDU deputy, Wolfgang Bosbach, had voiced a similar opinion, saying: “Veiling is part of the right to express your personality.” He also said a ban like the one in Belgium would be counter to the German constitution.

Both politicians’ remarks came a few days after German MEP Silvana Koch-Mehrin, European parliament vice-president and a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s junior coalition partners, called for a Europe-wide ban.

Much more pressing issues than the burqa will be discussed at the upcoming Islamic conference, held by with the German government in cooperation with Muslim organizations on May 17 in Nuremberg, de Maiziere said. There, issues such as whether there is an antagonistic atmosphere toward Islam in Germany, and the differentiation between Islam and Islamism, will be discussed, he said.

Hurriyet, 4 May 2010

Swiss council votes for ban on veil

A Swiss canton on Tuesday passed legislation preparing the groundwork for a possible ban on the Islamic burqa.

The local council in Aargau, a canton (state) in the north of Switzerland along the German border, voted overwhelmingly to work on a state initiative to make wearing the burqa in public places illegal. Most major parties backed the move.

Pushing the motion forward, the centrist and right wing parties in favour said the garment was a “symbol of male dominance over women,” according to the Swiss news agency SDA.The parties also said the full body veil prevents the integration of migrants into Swiss society.

The Socialist party objected to locally legislating on the matter, but members noted that they had negative views on the burqa, citing feminist concerns. The Green party was opposed, saying the proposal was “hysterics” and a scare-mongering tactic.

It is estimated that less than 100 Muslim women across Switzerland wear the burqa, a full body and face covering.

Earth Times, 4 May 2010

See also WRS, 4 May 2010